"Why Art in Space? = Why Space?"
Arthur Woods
Excerpted from the Tate-in-Space discussion forum. November
11, 2002
Approximately 100 years ago, at the beginning of the modernist
era and of "modern art", the avantgarde was
characterized by its confidence and optimism about the
future. They held the firm belief that the industrial
age was opening many new territories to explore and that
art, in its most noble and explicit way, would find the
necessary metaphors by which a radically changing culture
could be explained. There was no sense that civilization
would ever be threatened by the very forces that fueled
their optimism. There were no statistics about pollution,
overpopulation, ozone holes, and resource shortages to
numb the senses and to counter their optimism.
Yet, as the century progressed, modern art strived
and ultimately failed, as did religion, to provide modern humanity
with spiritual sustenance and ethical guidelines in the brave
new world of the 20th century. Consequently, post modern society
has become increasingly more materialistic at the expense of
the human spirit, its moral values and of its shared vision.
If our species continues with its relentless,
materialistic " business-as-usual" approach to current
human affairs, ignoring all of the obvious environmental and
political signals that are reported daily in the media until
it is too late; it is risking certain ecological collapse,
appropriation and rationalization of resources, political and
cultural repression, and the eventual crash of society under
the weight of too many people with too many problems on a planet
that is too small.
Indeed, we are already witnessing some of these
undesirable developments today - changes in the world climate,
extinctions, outbreaks of mass starvation, depletion of natural
food stocks and,
of course, terrorism and the wars over the control of finite
resources to mention only the most obvious.
It appears that the only alternative to the "business
as usual" approach to the future being seriously discussed
today can be generally described as the "green option" which
has set forth the seemingly impossible task of trying to change
human nature by persuading present society to retreat from
a dynamic, energy intensive, global market economy which has
enabled the substantial prosperity for the developed nations
at the expense of the lesser developed societies and of the
environment.
While the husbandry of valuable resources and
the search for alternatives to fossil fuels and nuclear power
are desirable and necessary goals that should be diligently
pursued, the absence of a viable terrestrial alternative to
humanity's growing energy requirements is a major concern for
a growing population. If humanity would consequently follow
the "green" path without first "solving" the
critical energy question, it must eventually turn off the very
economic engine that is essential to maintaining today's society
and, with it, the hopes and dreams of the developing societies
that have no other economic model on which to base their future
survival. In addition there is the "greenhouse factor".
Any alternative energy resource must also be free of greenhouse
gases as the impact of these on the climate and the environment
may be as critical as a lack of suffiecient energy.
With world population predicted to reach 8 billion
or slightly more by 2020, neither of the above options for
humanity's future are very optimistic in the near term. The
end result of the "green option" will not be much
different than that of the "business-as-usual" approach.
The stresses to the environment and to society will continue
to increase to the point of no return which will likely lead
to unimaginable acts of violence and destruction. The human
species will have become a victim of its own success and the
price of that success in the 20th century may unfortunately
spell the end of civilization as we know it in the 21st .
However, there is a third and "optimistic" option
to the above scenarios. Called the "Space Option",
it takes into account human nature and still offers a realistic
and equitable approach to meeting humanity's growing energy
needs. The Space Option is an evolutionary plan to significantly
meet the basic and anticipated needs of all human societies
on Earth through the utilization of extraterrestrial resources
- not for the in-situ support of science or exploration - but
rather to apply these resources and/or their products for use
on Earth at a conspicuous level.
The Space Option is not directly focused on colonizing
outer space nor about exploring distant planets and stars per
se, although these activities would most likely and logically
happen as a result. But rather, it is about accessing and utilizing
the infinite natural resources (to some extent for hu,man purposes)
located just above our heads rather than exhausting what is
left of the dwindling and finite resources located below our
feet.
When most people imagine "space" they
automatically assume immense emptiness and unobtainable distances.
However, within the boundaries of Earth's gravitational influence
which creates a sphere that extends 1.5 million kilometers
outwards, exists 13 million times the volume of the physical
Earth and through it, passes some 30,000 times the amount of
solar power than which is available on the surface of our planet.
Enormous amounts of other natural resources, including the
Moon, are located inside this 3 million kilometer sphere which
defines the true dimensions of our planet in relation to the
immediate cosmos. This definition has been referred to as "Greater
Earth".
Like the territorial waters surrounding nations,
these resources existing beyond the atmosphere belong to the
present and future inhabitants of our planet and could and
should, in my opinion, be used for their ultimate benefit.
Therefore, the Space Option does not need to be enacted on
Mars or elsewhere in the far solar system, it can be effectively
implemented within the celestial boundaries of our planet located
outside of the biosphere. There is plenty of room there for
new ideas, new forms, new structures and new adventures.
The fundamental advantage of the "Space
Option" over the other two options is that it would provide
our ambitious species with the necessary and limitless quantities
of clean solar energy and other raw materials to keep its present
civilization comfortably going throughout the millennium while
providing the means for hope and prosperity for the developing
populations and, at the same time, its benefits would contribute
to the preservation of the environment of the home planet for
future generations. Once the infrastructure to harness its
benefits is in place, and with the resulting wealth it will
create, it will irresistible for humanity to not to go further
- as I mentioned above, the Space Option is an evolutionary
plan. There is a growing body of of scientific literature about
how this can happen.
Space pioneer Krafft Ehricke stated in 1970:
"While civilization is more than
a high material living standard, it is nevertheless based
on material abundance. It does not thrive on abject poverty
nor in an atmosphere of resignation and hopelessness. It
needs vigor as well as vision. Therefore the end objectives
of solar system exploration are social objectives in the
sense that they relate to, or are dictated by, present
and future human needs."
Discussing options for humanity implies it making a choice.
Either humanity will embrace the opportunities implicit in
the Space Option to survive and thrive, or it must accept
the reality that present civilization has already reached
its peak. By ignoring the Space Option, humanity will have
turned its back on the future and will have begun the long
painful decent through its brief history, watching its magnificent
civilization crumble, piece by piece, into the rubble and
dust of a new Stone Age.
Indeed, choosing between a "Stone Age" or a "Space
Age" is the ultimate decision that must be made by those
alive on the planet at this very moment. However, the choice
has to be made soon - it can not be postponed.
Artists and architects of the new millennium, burdened with
the pessimistic baggage that has become the legacy of post
modernity, yet aware and convinced that human destiny on
Earth is irrevocably linked to human destiny in Space, have
the unique opportunity to passionately imagine and build
a truly optimistic and inspiring future for humanity - one
that is far more compelling than
any virtual reality so far imagined.
"spaceoptionism " , "spaceoptimism" , " spaceism" or ".............."
What should it be called?